# RFC: Community Governance Page

**URL:** https://discuss.freedombox.org/t/rfc-community-governance-page/192
**Category:** Community
**Created:** [June 5, 2019, 3:01pm UTC](https://discuss.freedombox.org/t/rfc-community-governance-page/192 "2019-06-05T15:01:38Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![haidar](https://discuss.freedombox.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@haidar](https://discuss.freedombox.org/u/haidar)
#### Post date: [June 7, 2019, 7:46pm UTC](https://discuss.freedombox.org/t/rfc-community-governance-page/192/4 "2019-06-07T19:46:48Z")

</div>

> [@mray](#):
>
> So what I would propose is to:
> 
> 1. come up with domains and roles that make sense for FreedomBox
> 2. agree on a workflow among domains
> 3. assign roles to people

Numbers 1 and 3 seem straightforward to me, and I wouldn’t oppose doing them.

Number 2 is the tough one. I think that our workflow among domains is generally free flowing because a lot of people work in multiple domains. If people are allowed to be in multiple domains (e.g. development and design), I would support defining a workflow among domains.

Last thing I want to say about all of this: I support a simple approach to your three proposals. I think we should be concise about our domains–the fewer, the better.

What do others think?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.freedombox.org/t/rfc-community-governance-page/192)._